Give Credit Where It's Due: A Beginner's Guide to git fame

In the world of software development, teamwork is key. Multiple developers often collaborate on a single project, contributing code, fixing bugs, and improving features. But how do you easily see who has contributed the most to a Git repository? That’s where git fame comes in!

git fame is a simple but powerful command-line tool that analyzes a Git repository’s history and generates a summary of contributor statistics. It helps you quickly identify top contributors, track individual contributions, and gain insights into the project’s development.

Why is this useful? 🔗

• Recognizing contributions: It provides a clear overview of who has contributed the most, allowing you to acknowledge and appreciate their efforts.
• Understanding team dynamics: It can reveal patterns of collaboration and identify key contributors in different areas of the project.
• Project analysis: It helps you understand the overall development effort and track changes over time.
• Fun and motivation: It can be a fun way to foster a sense of community and friendly competition within a development team.

Getting Started with git fame 🔗

Installation 🔗

git fame is typically installed using gem (RubyGems):

gem install git_fame

If you don’t have RubyGems installed, you’ll need to install Ruby first. On macOS, you can use Homebrew:

brew install ruby

On Debian/Ubuntu-based systems:

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install ruby-full

Basic Usage 🔗

Once installed, navigate to your Git repository in the terminal and simply run:

git fame

This will generate a table showing the top contributors, sorted by the number of commits.

Example Output 🔗

The output will look something like this:

Showing first 10 contributors out of 12.

| Author             | Commits | Added | Removed |
|--------------------|---------|-------|---------|
| John Doe           | 50      | 1000  | 500     |
| Jane Smith         | 30      | 750   | 250     |
| Peter Jones        | 20      | 500   | 100     |
...

This table shows:

• Author: The name of the contributor.
• Commits: The number of commits made by the contributor.
• Added: The number of lines of code added by the contributor.
• Removed: The number of lines of code removed by the contributor.

Options and Customization 🔗

git fame offers several options to customize the output:

• -n <number> or --top <number>: Show the top n contributors. For example, git fame -n 5 will show the top 5 contributors.
• -w or --by-lines: Sort by the number of lines changed (added + removed) instead of the number of commits.
• -c or --by-commits: Explicitly sort by the number of commits (this is the default).
• --since <date> and --until <date>: Filter contributions within a specific time range. For example, git fame --since "1 month ago" will show contributions from the last month.
• --format <format>: Choose the output format. Options include text (default), csv, and json.

Examples with Options 🔗

To show the top 3 contributors sorted by lines changed within the last year, you would use:

git fame -w -n 3 --since "1 year ago"

Exclude files/directories that match the specified regular expression:

git fame --excl "regular_expression"

Calculate contributions made after the specified date:

git fame --since "3 weeks ago|2021-05-13"

Display contributions in the specified format:

git fame --format pipe|yaml|json|csv|tsv

Display contributions per file extension:

git fame --bytype

Ignore whitespace changes:

git fame --ignore-whitespace

Detect inter-file line moves and copies:

git fame -C

Detect intra-file line moves and copies:

git fame -M

Important Considerations 🔗

• Accuracy: git fame relies on the information in the Git commit history. If commit messages are not properly attributed or if there are merge commits that don’t accurately reflect individual contributions, the results may not be entirely accurate.
• Context: While git fame provides valuable quantitative data, it’s important to remember that contributions are not solely measured by lines of code or the number of commits. Other important contributions, such as code reviews, bug reports, and documentation, are not directly reflected in the output.
• Focus on Collaboration: Use git fame as a tool for understanding team dynamics and recognizing contributions, but avoid using it in a way that creates unhealthy competition or undervalues other forms of contribution.

Conclusion 🔗

git fame is a handy opensource tool for quickly analyzing contributor statistics in a Git repository. It provides valuable insights into team dynamics and helps you recognize the efforts of individual contributors. Use it responsibly and in the context of a collaborative and supportive development environment.

I hope this post helps you. If you know a person who can benefit from this information, send them a link of this post. If you want to get notified about new posts, follow me on YouTube , Twitter (x) , LinkedIn , and GitHub .